[ExchangeList] Re: Exchange Multiple forest scenario...
- From: Rick Boza <rickb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:47:34 -0500
That sounds like a fine patchwork solution for the time being, but I
wouldn¹t suggest you plan to rely on it for long. Using CSVDE on a regular
basis will eventually evolve into users calling for problems with missing
recipient, which will lead to running your imports nightly, or even more
often. Eventually imports and exports wind up breaking / masing / missing
something and lead to grief you probably don¹t need.
If you put a trust in place, you could then look at migrating mailboxes to a
single org (presumably DEF.COM) and continue to use the same user IDs by
using the associated external account flag. See
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/WorkingE2k3Stor
e/8c4befe3-3815-4b6b-a759-1e5a2878499d.mspx?mfr=true
This still isn¹t a long term solution (nor was it ever intended to be) but
it gets around all sorts of potential problems with GAL syncs, repliability,
and delegation. Eventually, though, you need to consider a long-term
approach, unless you are anticipating a quick divestiture.
Rick
From: MAHADEVAN Subramanyan <SMahadevan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:39:40 +0530
To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Conversation: [ExchangeList] Re: Exchange Multiple forest scenario...
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Exchange Multiple forest scenario...
Hi Prabhakar,
Thanks for your input?
Yep? It is Win2k3 Native mode? But do we need trust for this? If so why is
it needed?
We have just planed to use the Exchange in a Hub & Spoke topology for
relaying the mail for multiple organizations.
We can export and import the users using CSVDE tool on regular basis or in
future we have plans to use IIFP?
Regards, Mahadevan
From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Prabhu Kamuni
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:56 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: Exchange Multiple forest scenario...
Maha,
It seems u r not missing, but i have a Question ?
Is it Win2k3 Native ? is there any trust relationships between forests?
(ABC &def)
you mean to say you will be creating all the ABC.com user objects as
contacts in DEF.com?
Yes everything should work in this case....(MX record is there,Receipnent
policy is in place,conatcts info is there)
Please correct me experts if am wrong ?
Thanks in adv
Thanks
Prabhakar,Banglore.
INDIA.
----- Original Message ----
From: MAHADEVAN Subramanyan <SMahadevan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 11:12:35 AM
Subject: [ExchangeList] Exchange Multiple forest scenario...
Hi,
I have a question...
Assume that a company is acquiring another company which has its own Forest
and Separate Exchange organization. The SMTP domain ID for the acquired
company is @ABC.COM and the Existing SMTP domain ID in this company is
@DEF.COM. We have added DEF.COM to ABC.COM through Recipient Policies and
have set DEF.COM as the primary address so that all the Reply to address
will be DEF.COM. Now the requirement is all the mails which are sent to
users in the recently acquired company should be relayed through the Mail
Server at DEF.COM.
After setting up the proper MX records, is it enough if we have the contact
objects for the ABC.COM users and a SMTP connector which will forward the
mails to the mail server in the ABC.COM domain? Plz advise if I am missing
out something?
Regards, Mahadevan
Confidentiality Statement:
This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which is
exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended
recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from disseminating
or distributing this information (other than to the intended recipient) or
copying this information. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by return email.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42297/*http:/advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbe
ta>
Confidentiality Statement:
This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which is
exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended
recipient, please note that you are strictly prohibited from disseminating
or distributing this information (other than to the intended recipient) or
copying this information. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by return email.
Other related posts:
