RE: Excessive transaction logs: corrupt messages?

  • From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:27:49 -0300

Robert...:))

Sorry, couldn't resist 

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas M. Long [mailto:dlong@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 4:00 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Excessive transaction logs: corrupt
messages?

http://www.MSExchange.org/

Would you happen to know the name of the worm?


-----Original Message-----
From: Medeiros, Jose [mailto:jmedeiros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:49 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Excessive transaction logs: corrupt
messages?

http://www.MSExchange.org/

I have only seen this with a worm that was infecting every mailbox. 

Jose

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas M. Long [mailto:dlong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 7:12 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Excessive transaction logs: corrupt messages?


http://www.MSExchange.org/

I had a problem this weekend where there was an excessive amount of
transaction logs being created. I tried for hours to find the problem,
but the only thing that looked out of the norm were messages in the
queues that had no sender and I could not delete them. From that, my
only conclusion was that there were malformed/corrupt messages in the
queues creating these transaction logs. After a reboot everything
resumed to normal.

Is there a way to detect corrupt messages (incase this happens again, I
would like to pinpoint it)? Has anyone else experienced this problem, or
does it sound like corrupt messages were not at fault?

Any insight is much appreciated. Thanks

 

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
jmedeiros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp 
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
dlong@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp 
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
ExchangeMailingList@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The correct technical term for haggis stalking is "havering". 



Other related posts: