[ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- From: William Holmes <wtholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:53:38 -0500
Title: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
|
Here’s a question related to this: Do contact objects or user objects with
external email addresses really need an X400 address? It sounds (by your
explanation of how X400 addresses are used) that objects that don’t have
mailboxes don’t really need the x400 address. Thanks Bill From:
exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith If you delete them, you’ll regret
it. Exchange uses them for several things,
perhaps most importantly to map a user account to the mailbox object in the
mailstore. I think it would be true to say that Exchange
no longer uses those addresses for message routing. From:
exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arnold, Jamie I
can’t find anything that says this definitively, but it was my
understanding that Exchange 2003 and higher no longer uses X400 addressing
within the org and that SMTP addresses are all it requires to function. True? Thanks |
- Follow-Ups:
- [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- From: Michael B. Smith
- [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- References:
- [ExchangeList] Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- From: Arnold, Jamie
- [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- From: Michael B. Smith
- [ExchangeList] Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
Other related posts:
- » [ExchangeList] Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- » [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- » [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?
- » [ExchangeList] Re: Does 2003 require X400 addresses?