RE: Designing Exchange 2003 Enterprise 70-285
- From: "Medeiros, Jose" <jmedeiros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:41:12 -0700
Thanks for the feedback and I agree that in practice I would prefer to run
Exchange 2000 on a active / passive cluster. Now with Exchange 2003 on a three
node or larger cluster with one of the servers as a passive node assigned to
failover for either active node that may fail, I am sure is an even better
solution.
However in the case of this test question on the 70-285 exam, which choice
would be correct?
Jose
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:15 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Designing Exchange 2003 Enterprise 70-285
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Exchange cluster models
Active/Passive is the strongly preferred model
Fewer EVS' than nodes
Must use if more than two nodes
Active/Active is the strongly discouraged model
Maximum of two nodes and maximum of two EVS'
Maximum one RSG per cluster (824126)
Limits number of concurrent MAPI users per node to 1,900
Limits average CPU utilization on each node to 40%
Two instances of store running in one Store.exe process; not enough
contiguous virtual memory to bring �B;resource online
-----Original Message-----
From: Periyasamy, Raj [mailto:Raj.Periyasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 1:10 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Designing Exchange 2003 Enterprise 70-285
http://www.MSExchange.org/
We have been using Active/Active for 3 years, no problems. We used
Exchange 2000 and upgraded to Exchange 2003. No problems at all.
HTH.
Regards,
Raj Periyasamy
Systems Administrator
MCSE(Messaging), CCNA
-----Original Message-----
From: Medeiros, Jose [mailto:jmedeiros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:08 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Designing Exchange 2003 Enterprise 70-285
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Greetings,
I just took the 70-285 exam yesterday. One of the test questions asked about
hosting mailboxes on either an Active / Active Exchange Cluster or an Active /
Passive Exchange Cluster which one be the correct choice?
Any one pass this test and know the correct answer?
My understanding is that Microsoft no longer recommends using Exchange
in an Active / Active Cluster ( At least with version 2000 ) however I
have not had an opportunity to try this with Exchange 2003. Any one
running an Active / Active Exchange 2003 Cluster and how is working? Does it
failover correctly and failback with out any issues?
Sincerely,
Jose Medeiros
408-449-6621 Cell
Former Vice President and Postmaster NTEA
MCP+I, MCSE, NT4 MCT
www.ntea.net
www.tvnug.org
www.sfntug.org
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading
Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security
Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library:
http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
raj.periyasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading
Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security
Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library:
http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
ExchangeMailingList@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The correct technical term for haggis stalking is "havering".
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
jmedeiros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
