RE: Business continuity

  • From: "MJ" <mjtech@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:41:09 -0500

we ar using double take for file servers, and there is nothing nice about.
it's not worth the money the company spent it.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Brian Pituley [mailto:bpituley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
  Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:56 PM
  To: [ExchangeList]
  Subject: [exchangelist] Business continuity


  http://www.MSExchange.org/

  Question:

  Is anyone using NSI Software's "Double-Take for Exchange" for high
availability?  If so, any feedback, positive or negative?

  I've been reading up on it and it sounds like the best thing since the
electron (marketing materials will do that) so I'm looking for real-world
feedback.

  Brian Pituley
  Director of Information Technology
  T: 408-441-3611
  F: 408-441-8405
  E: bpituley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


  ------------------------------------------------------
  List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
  Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
  ------------------------------------------------------
  Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
  http://www.techgenix.com
  ------------------------------------------------------
  You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
mjtech@xxxxxxxxx
  To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
  Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: