Backup MX records.
- From: <paul_lemonidis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:44:34 +0100
Hi All
I have an Exchange 2003 Service Pack 1 machine.
My question relates to SMTP sending. Every so often I see messages queued up
for remote hosts. Sure enough from the machine I telnet to the lowest cost MX
record for the remote host and the connection is dropped with an error 421,
connection lost message. However, on a number of occasions I can sucessfully
telnet to the higher cost hosts. Exchange, however, will simply not use them.
Today as a test I decided to setup a second Internet Mail connector and limit
the address space to just the Domain affected. I then rather than use DNS to
forward the message chose to use the second MX record to forward to the second
lowest cost MX record host directly. I then went to the queue and forced
delievery. This time the message was delievered fine, well the message
certainly disappeared from the queue and was not bounced. I will not be
absolutely able to confirm he received it until tomorrow unfortunately but I am
confident he will have.
My question is this. I was told many months ago that 421 means please try again
later and hence Exchange will do that rather than trying alternative MX
records. Does this thus mean that any server on the Internet that issues this
message makes the whole concept of backup MX records worthless? Based on what I
understamd you could have 100 servers but if the first one has the lowest MX
record cost and issues a 421 message Exchange\SMTP will simply ignore all 99
others despite them being able to receive perfectly? Firstly am I correct and
secondly is this a generic SMTP problem or an Exchange problem and finally
other than my somewhat less than ideal workaround is there a better way of
resolving the issue please?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Paul Lemonidis.
Other related posts: