Batya wrote: >When replying to a message, I'm sure most of us >automatically push the 'reply' button -- so I hope >that explains why not all the responses make it >to the list! >By the way, is the following the correct address for sending replies? >ask@xxxxxxxx The official list address is - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx When a message is sent to this address, it is clear that it is meant for the list. When people reply to these messages, their reply comes back directly to the list address. (*Note - attached files can not be sent to this address) People often send messages to ask@xxxxxxxx, which are meant for the list. I then forward these messages to the list address. (If there is an attached file in their message, I put this file up on the site and put a link to it from their message.) When people reply to these messages, their reply comes back to ask@xxxxxxxxx In both instances, when replies come in, this often requires a guessing game on my part. Did they mean to reply to the list, or was their reply meant only to go to the original sender (people usually don't notice where their reply is going to when they click on the reply button). In some cases, it is clear that people do not mean to reply to the list, but rather only to the original sender. These are usually messages which don't relate to the original message: - "Hi X, Haven't heard from you for ages. How are the children? I understand that Johnny's Bar Mitzvah is coming up soon." or "Hi Y, I meant to ask you something at our last teacher's meaning, etc." This usually opens up an ongoing dialogue in which their replies continue to come back to me, my becoming privy to all of their family or school information. Sometimes I try to make them realize that they are not replying directly to each other, despite the many indications of this in the message, but this usually doesn't work and it is quicker to simply forward it on. In these cases, I simply forward the message directly to the original sender and not to the list, in order to avoid embarrassment. The more complicated issue arises when the person replies to the content of the original message to the list, but it is not clear whether this is meant for the original sender only, or also for the list. In this case, I usually forward the message on to the list, if I think the list members - as a whole - will benefit from it. If this appears to be an answer to a personal request for information that is mainly of interest only to the original sender of the message, I do not forward it on to the whole list. Complicated, eh? Just another element to add spice and flavour to the day. Any input on this matter is welcome. (But let me know if it is meant only for me, or for the list ... or maybe for Aunt Dorothy ...) David ----------------------------------------------- ** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org or - http://www.etni.org.il ** ** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx ** ** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** -----------------------------------------------