[etni] Re: bagrut module D
- From: David Graniewitz <graniewitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kathip@xxxxxxxxx, etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:27:00 +0300 (IDT)
There was a directive from the Powers-that-Be telling us to
delete the first option. You're right; they were both right.
I think that the question was meant to have directed the
pupils to the first paragraph only where the teacher is not
yet mentioned, but someone messed up. There was also a
mistake in the instructions for the F module telling pupils
to only write 100-120 words for the essay.
May I be as bold as to suggest that bloopers such as these
on a national official exam are unexcusable. Is anyone going
to take ministerial responsibility for this?
David
-----------------------------------------------
** Etni homepage - www.etni.org **
** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx **
** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **
-----------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- From: David Graniewitz
- [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- From: Kathi Pearlmutter
Other related posts:
- » [etni] bagrut module D
- » [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- » [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- » [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- From: David Graniewitz
- [etni] Re: bagrut module D
- From: Kathi Pearlmutter