[etni] Re: Fw: re: grading bagroots -- an innocent question
- From: David Graniewitz <graniewitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ask@xxxxxxxx, ETNI <etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, judyastary@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:52:30 +0200 (IST)
Sorry to split hairs but isn't the expression "to pre-
memorise" tautology. You can't memorise something after you
need it, can you?
David "nit-picker" Graniewitz
----- Original Message -----
From: judyastary@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: grading bagroots -- an innocent question
From 1998 till 2003 there was a system of Accuracy and
Communicative
ability.
In 5 point tests there were two compositions worth 10 pts
each. Most pupils
got a n average 7/10 (4 for communicative ab. and 3 for
accuracy) unless it
was especially abysmal, then s/he might get a 3 + 2 (out of
10 per compo).
There were also discrepancies between the two types of
compos. some genres
were done better than others (depnding on how many phrases
of the format had
been pre-memorized.) Prior to 1997 the whole nature of the
tests was
different and it is simply too distressing to go into it.
Rest assured,
however, that the change to communo-accurate (1998)
represents the top of
the slippery descent into communo- inaccurate.
Judith Astary
-----------------------------------------------
Call for Articles
The Etni Rag needs you
** Etni homepage - http://www.etni.org
or - http://www.etni.org.il **
** for help - ask@xxxxxxxx **
** to post to this list - etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **
-----------------------------------------------
Other related posts: