[etni] [FWD: Re: reliability of bagrut exams]
- From: ask@xxxxxxxx
- To: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 20:27:14 -0700
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: reliability of bagrut exams
From: z_levi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That is not reliability. What your are describing is perhaps content
validity. These are both testology terms.
Tziona.
Ruth wrote:
>It certainly does NOT apply in History for example. There is" Home" the
>kids know exactly what to study for the test and what questions will be
>asked more or less. They have sample questions in books,on the net.
>They prepare ... if they prepared well they do well,if they didn't they
>don't
>simple as that.This is exactly why I suggested we make a body of
>material to be learned e.g literature so that our classes will not become
>irrelevant as they are now, and kids will not feel our Tziun Magen
>has no relevance to the exam , and will not say there is nothing to
>prepare for as they do for Unseen and essay.
Motti wrote:
> "It seems clear that the Bagrut exams in English,
> in their current form, are neither reliable nor
> valid forms of assessment of the students'
> achievements in English."
Sharon wrote:
> I wonder, are the bagrut exams in other subjects
> reliable,....does this problem exist in all of the
> subjects?
Other related posts:
- » [etni] [FWD: Re: reliability of bagrut exams]