Thanks for the deadline reminder John - I have now voted! Just for the record, I found Amendment Number 4 a little tricky, due to the following definition: a. Ordinary members. Any person with professional qualifications relevant to applied neuroscience. It was the word 'relevant' that got me. I think that for clarity it would have been helpful to have specified a list of professional qualifications that are deemed 'relevant'. Of course, it is too late in the day now to clarify this, and I regret having left it so late! The reason I think that this point is particularly important is because those members not falling into the category of 'ordinary members' (or c or d) will be automatically be classified as 'Affiliate' and will therefore not have a right to vote. The right to vote is what separates these catagories - definitively. Also - I have voted on the basis of the Amendment descriptors - there seemed to be a few anomalies in terms of article numbers, amendment numbers and amendment descriptors (despite the explanation that scrapping article III would have a knock-on effect on numbering)- but maybe that was just my perception... You will be sadly missed at the Brits of course! But, yes, I will try and galvanise the group once more in the late autumn/early winter. Perhaps November, because those of us in the UK will need a little warmth... Melissa Foks PGCE MA Psychology of Education +44 (0) 20 7207 0801 No warmth, no cheerfulness, no healthful ease, No comfortable feel in any member - No shade, no shine, no butterflies, no bees, No fruits, no flowers, no birds, no leaves, - November! (Thomas Hood)