[esnr] Re: AW: Re: Standardised Equipment
- From: "Berrie Gerrits" <praktijkgerrits@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:56:19 +0200
Piano, piano Marco,
I believe in second chances, even if a big group has the same experiences with
one company (and as you know, I am amongst those who has had several
disappointing exp. with several companies).
I think step one would be technical standards concerning hard and software.
Step two: what was the service in the past?
Step three: what are the manufacturers going to do with bad experiences and
what GARANTEES are they offering for better service in the future ?
Power to the consumers !! Ogni consumenti ha il diretto de servicio maximale
(this is improvised Italian ;-). Ciao ciao
Met vriendelijke groet/All the best/Ciao,
Berrie Gerrits
Psychologenpraktijk Gerrits
Sloetstraat 14
6524 AS Nijmegen
Nederland/Netherlands
Tel: 024-3235053
praktijkgerrits@xxxxxxxxx
Psychotherapie/eerstelijnspsychologie/Supervisie
Neurofeedback en QEEG gecertificeerd (AAPB CR)
BIG geregistreerd (GZ en psychotherapie)
----- Original Message -----
From: Marco Congedo
To: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: [esnr] Re: AW: Re: Standardised Equipment
Excellent suggestion. Indeed the efficacy of the support should be an
important factor in selecting a software/hardware provider. This should be
based on past experience of customers, since, as latin said, verba volant!
(words "fly").
Unfortunately, but interestingly enough, if one would give high priority to
this criterion, most apparently succesful companies (and among them three well
known "european" hardware companies) should be excluded a priori!
Marco
Ralph Warnke <ralph.warnke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is also an experience I could not agree more with: There are a number
of good systems out there (and some not so good ones). But the most important
aspect in my eyes is a profound local and international support from the
provider as ALL systems require assistence when getting started and to achieve
superb results in due course. So I would like to second Melissa´s broader
approach in this respect.
Best regards,
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
aus der Wedemark
(Ralph Warnke)
MediTECH Electronic GmbH
Langer Acker 7
D-30900 Wedemark
------------------------------------------------------
Telefon: 05130 - 97778-0
Telefax: 05130 - 97778-22
------------------------------------------------------
www.meditech.de
www.brainboy.de
www.brainfeedback.de
------------------------------------------------------
ralph.warnke@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: esnr-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:esnr-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Foksfam@xxxxxxx
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Oktober 2004 12:27
An: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [esnr] Re: Standardised Equipment
In a message dated 11/10/2004 11:21:02 GMT Daylight Time,
Doklein@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
my vision would be: recommendations for minimum requirements of
equipment-features - but neutral resp. products.
I think both are needed - a specification of minimum requirements, which
may be common to several systems - but also a specific product recommendation
in order to obtain best prices, funding and support from a committed provider.
Melissa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
Other related posts:
