Re: featurerequest: status bar
- From: tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:55:23 +1100
> > I now have a running version which shows
> >
> > N item(s) selected of X displayed, Y non-displayed, in /<whatever>
>
> It does not change much, but eliminating the commas and putting "Y
> non-displayed" in [] would be better. At least it would be clearer. And
> I do not think the "item(s)" is that necessary. And it gets shorter. So,
> the status bar could look like this:
>
> N selected of X displayed [Y non-displayed] in /<whatever>
>
>
> "non-displayed" is proxy for "filtered, and/or hidden items that are
> > actually hidden"
>
> I have just looked at
> http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/hide_1?view=uk. "Non-displayed" -
> which does not look nor sound nice - could be replaced by concealed.
> Just a thought.
"concealed" = great suggestion. It's in.
Regards
Tom
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
- References:
- featurerequest: status bar
- From: Liviu Andronic
- Re: featurerequest: status bar
- From: tpgww
- Re: featurerequest: status bar
- From: Liviu Andronic
Other related posts:
- » featurerequest: status bar
- » Re: featurerequest: status bar
- » Re: featurerequest: status bar
- » Re: featurerequest: status bar
- featurerequest: status bar
- From: Liviu Andronic
- Re: featurerequest: status bar
- From: tpgww
- Re: featurerequest: status bar
- From: Liviu Andronic