Re: Small request regarding the 0.5.0 release.

On 11/14/08, Walther Maldonado <walther.md@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It was easy to work around, that is true. I just suggested that the package 
> version convention would be accepted to make for a smoother integration into 
> Portage. if this small mistake is not going to be corrected, very well, I 
> will suggest the modified ebuild to support this inconsistency anyway.
>
Could you please post a link to the ebuild you'd like to propose? Or,
if bug report already submitted, the link to the bug? I feel the
Portage ebuild supports too few USE flags, and that it would be
relatively easy for the ebuild to support many more.
Liviu

-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


-- 
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to 
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by 
logging into the web interface.

Other related posts: