Re: Small request regarding the 0.5.0 release.
- From: Walther Maldonado <walther.md@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:48:45 +0100
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:07:57 +0100
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.11.2008, 18:12 +0100 schrieb Walther Maldonado:
> >
> > Is it too much to ask that the version of the unpacked directory be
> > corrected ("emelfm2-0.5.0") to allow smoother incorporation to the
> > portage tree?
>
> I had a similar problem with the packages for Fedora, see
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/emelfm2/04-2008/msg00003.html
>
> It's easy to work around in rpm, not sure about portage though.
It was easy to work around, that is true. I just suggested that the package
version convention would be accepted to make for a smoother integration into
Portage. if this small mistake is not going to be corrected, very well, I will
suggest the modified ebuild to support this inconsistency anyway.
Walther.
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts: