Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:00:07 -0400
Florian Zähringer wrote:
Hi!
The problem is the changelog file.
Seems like Tom forgot to update this. No big deal.
Just add the lines
emelfm2 (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream
-- Florian Zaehringer <flo.zaehringer@xxxxxx> Thu, 26 Aug 2006 20:03:20 -0400
on top. And it should label as 0.2
Cheers,
-- Florian
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:08:41 -0400
dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In summary, relative to 0.1.8:
* a variety of fine-tunes of the user-interface
* several small operational changes
* updated translations
* bugs fixed (the more serious ones were all done in the 0.1.8 patch)
See http://emelfm2.net/ChangeLog for details.
Three candles. Well, almost. Version 0.0.1 of emelFM2 was released on 6
September 2003.
Three years have included 18 official releases and 12 or 13 pre-releases, so
maybe the speed is not so bad. We must do something about the numbering scheme,
if we are to get to 1.0 this lifetime !
These days, the general shape and feel of emelFM2 is fairly stable. Presumably there will
be bugs to find and fix, but probably no more significant change. A possible exception,
the addition of vfs capability (in essence, the ability to show things other than mounted
local directories in file-lists) is presently classed among the "changes that may
not be worth the effort". More on this in another message.
Regards
Tom
Another fine release! I am having a little trouble making a deb package
for this release. That's not completely accurate; I can make the deb
package just fine with sudo debian/rules binary, and it installs fine
too. The problem I am having is the package that gets built is
emelfm2_0.1.8-1_i386.deb. The about dialog shows the version correctly
as 0.2. I have edited both the /debian/files, and /debian/control files,
and changed older instances to read 0.2.
Like I said, it works, and installs just fine, it is the latest version,
just the deb package is incorrectly mis-labled. Any ideas?
btw, I don't have this problem using checkinstall to build the deb package.
--
David S. Yates
webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com
blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog
podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Thanks!
--
David S. Yates
webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com
blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog
podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: dsyates
- References:
- RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: tpgww
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: dsyates
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: Florian Zähringer
Other related posts:
- » RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- » Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
Hi!
The problem is the changelog file.
Seems like Tom forgot to update this. No big deal. Just add the lines
emelfm2 (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream
-- Florian Zaehringer <flo.zaehringer@xxxxxx> Thu, 26 Aug 2006 20:03:20 -0400
on top. And it should label as 0.2
Cheers, -- Florian
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:08:41 -0400 dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Another fine release! I am having a little trouble making a deb package for this release. That's not completely accurate; I can make the deb package just fine with sudo debian/rules binary, and it installs fine too. The problem I am having is the package that gets built is emelfm2_0.1.8-1_i386.deb. The about dialog shows the version correctly as 0.2. I have edited both the /debian/files, and /debian/control files, and changed older instances to read 0.2.In summary, relative to 0.1.8:
* a variety of fine-tunes of the user-interface * several small operational changes * updated translations * bugs fixed (the more serious ones were all done in the 0.1.8 patch)
See http://emelfm2.net/ChangeLog for details.
Three candles. Well, almost. Version 0.0.1 of emelFM2 was released on 6 September 2003.
Three years have included 18 official releases and 12 or 13 pre-releases, so maybe the speed is not so bad. We must do something about the numbering scheme, if we are to get to 1.0 this lifetime !
These days, the general shape and feel of emelFM2 is fairly stable. Presumably there will be bugs to find and fix, but probably no more significant change. A possible exception, the addition of vfs capability (in essence, the ability to show things other than mounted local directories in file-lists) is presently classed among the "changes that may not be worth the effort". More on this in another message.
Regards Tom
Like I said, it works, and installs just fine, it is the latest version, just the deb package is incorrectly mis-labled. Any ideas?
btw, I don't have this problem using checkinstall to build the deb package.
-- David S. Yates webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
-- Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by logging into the web interface.
-- David S. Yates webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
-- Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by logging into the web interface.
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: dsyates
- RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: tpgww
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: dsyates
- Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: Florian Zähringer