Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2

Hi!

The problem is the changelog file.

Seems like Tom forgot to update this. No big deal.
Just add the lines

emelfm2 (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

   * new upstream
 
  -- Florian Zaehringer <flo.zaehringer@xxxxxx>  Thu, 26 Aug 2006 20:03:20 -0400

on top. And it should label as 0.2

Cheers,
-- Florian

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:08:41 -0400
dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > In summary, relative to 0.1.8:
> > 
> > * a variety of fine-tunes of the user-interface
> > * several small operational changes
> > * updated translations
> > * bugs fixed (the more serious ones were all done in the 0.1.8 patch)
> > 
> > See http://emelfm2.net/ChangeLog for details.
> > 
> > Three candles. Well, almost. Version 0.0.1 of emelFM2 was released on 6 
> > September 2003.
> > 
> > Three years have included 18 official releases and 12 or 13 pre-releases, 
> > so maybe the speed is not so bad. We must do something about the numbering 
> > scheme, if we are to get to 1.0 this lifetime !
> > 
> > These days, the general shape and feel of emelFM2 is fairly stable. 
> > Presumably there will be bugs to find and fix, but probably no more 
> > significant change. A possible exception, the addition of vfs capability 
> > (in essence, the ability to show things other than mounted local 
> > directories in file-lists) is presently classed among the "changes that may 
> > not be worth the effort". More on this in another message.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Tom
> > 
> > 
> Another fine release! I am having a little trouble making a deb package 
> for this release. That's not completely accurate; I can make the deb 
> package just fine with sudo debian/rules binary, and it installs fine 
> too. The problem I am having is the package that gets built is 
> emelfm2_0.1.8-1_i386.deb. The about dialog shows the version correctly 
> as 0.2. I have edited both the /debian/files, and /debian/control files, 
> and changed older instances to read 0.2.
> Like I said, it works, and installs just fine, it is the latest version, 
> just the deb package is incorrectly mis-labled. Any ideas?
> btw, I don't have this problem using checkinstall to build the deb package.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> David S. Yates
> webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com
> blog:    http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog
> podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to 
> emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by 
> logging into the web interface.


-- 
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to 
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by 
logging into the web interface.

Other related posts: