Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 00:41:51 +1100
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:49:14 -0500
dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Is that KERNEL_FAM=1 option still necessary to get around the pane
> >> refresh thingy?
> >
> > No. But I'm not sure why anyone would bother to build without KERNEL_FAM=1
> > (or USE_INOTIFY=1) if they use a recent linux kernel.
> >
> is there a reason why KERNEL_FAM=1 is not the default in the
> Makefile.config?
All default options are "lowest common denominator". Not all emelfm2 users run
linux, nor should we assume what version they have. Nobody has ever volunteered
to do the necessary work for kqueue, portevents, imon etc support on other OS's.
Regards
Tom
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
- References:
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: dsyates
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: tpgww
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: dsyates
Other related posts:
- » PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- » Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- » Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- » Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- » Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: dsyates
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: tpgww
- Re: PATCH for emelFM2 0.3.6
- From: dsyates