Re: Debian packaging
- From: <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:11:38 +1000
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:52:31 +0200
Ralf Meyer <ranfyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 04:56:06 +1000
> <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I know just about nil about debian and ubuntu packaging, and how it
> > is handled after a release.
>
> This is from Debian's "new maintainer guide":
> http://www.us.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html#s-newupstream
>
> > If some of you folks can advise what is
> > best, it can probably be handled. But we prefer to avoid releasing
> > two separate tarballs each time.
>
> I agree with you that having 2 release tarballs should be avoided.
> I think the easiest way would be to rename the existing "debian"
> directory to something like "debian-unofficial", "debian-flo" or
> whatever.
Final call - any other perspectives on this ?
Regards
Tom
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
- References:
- Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer
Other related posts:
- » Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer