Re: Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer <ranfyy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:52:31 +0200
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 04:56:06 +1000
<tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know just about nil about debian and ubuntu packaging, and how it
> is handled after a release.
This is from Debian's "new maintainer guide":
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html#s-newupstream
> If some of you folks can advise what is
> best, it can probably be handled. But we prefer to avoid releasing
> two separate tarballs each time.
I agree with you that having 2 release tarballs should be avoided.
I think the easiest way would be to rename the existing "debian"
directory to something like "debian-unofficial", "debian-flo" or
whatever.
--
bye
ranf
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww
- References:
- Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww
Other related posts:
- » Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- » Re: Debian packaging
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww
- Debian packaging
- From: Ralf Meyer
- Re: Debian packaging
- From: tpgww