Yeah...the Variomatic was very much like
the old centrifugal clutch on go-karts, but it went a little
further and instead of just engaging when the engine sped reached
a certain point, it would change the ratio constantly depending on
how the pulley pieces (cone-shaped) would come toward one another
or move further apart, allowing for in infinite ratio value. The
design is still in use, according to the Wiki article:
"Today the CVT works according to the same
principle of split pulleys allowing infinitely variable gear
ratios. Rather than the pulled rubber drive belts as used by DAF,
the modern transmission is made much more durable by the use of
steel link belts that are pushed by their pulleys. This update was
pioneered by Fiat, Ford and Van Doorne in the Netherlands from the
1980s. The gearbox is also under electronic control. The CVT is
available in cars such as Audi,
Honda
and the MINI ONE and MINI Cooper. Tata Motors from India,
recently announced that it too would use a Variomatic transmission
in its $2500 Nano."
I gotta get the photos from that show prepared and on the
web...along with about a million other things.
Here's another:
This is a work-in-progress. It's a replica of Ab Jenkins' 1934
Pierce-Arrow "Mormon Meteor". The history of Jenkins' meteors is a
little fuzzy, but this was the first one, as far as I can
determine. Some info about Jenkins is here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_Jenkins If that page is correct,
the Pontiac Bonneville model was named because of the record-setting
runs Jenkins made in a 56 Poncho. I'd never heard that before.
r
On 5/20/2012 11:46 AM, John Christensen wrote:
That is interesting. The transmission sounds like
something on an old go-cart with the clutch thingy.
Got to get out to a car show soon...... I am having withdrawal.
JC
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ray
Buck <rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
According to a guy who builds race transmissions for a
living, this is about normal...at least in his world. I'm
sure there are others who'd do it for less, and I'm
looking into that. But still...yanno, I wonder
how hard it would be to do it myself. I've never dug into
an automatic trans. Something else to consider.
Btw, I shot a car show yesterday and one of the cars there
was quite an oddball. A 1967 DAF:
Count the number of wires on the distributor cap. Yep, 3.
One for the coil. Opposed 2 cylinder. But the kicker is
its transmission. It's called "Variomatic." Stepless,
infinitely variable ratio belt drive. Totally wacko. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variomatic
r
On 5/19/2012 9:34 AM, STILLFRANKSFAULT@xxxxxxx
wrote:
OMG that's highway robbery, 600-800 for a
disassemble and reassemble with no parts. Please
tell me this is a joke when you say only.
Smokey Mt Frank
In a message dated 5/19/2012 11:06:13
A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
The
estimate to swap guts from one case to
another is only $600-800. Cheap at half
the price. :)
r
On 5/17/2012 5:56 AM, STILLFRANKSFAULT@xxxxxxx
wrote:
Well Ray, in theory, the only
thing you need is a case. Why
rebuild another trans. Just swap all
the internals to a new case.
Or was there more damage?
Smokey
Mt Frank
In a message dated
5/16/2012 10:28:19 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time, rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
Color
me stupid. I should have
seen it when I pulled the
pan. But I didn't.
I didn't lose too much
time on that, tho. I
finally got the tranny out
tonite:
It's real broke.
I'm starting to re-think
things. If this
transmission repair is gonna
be real spendy, I may put
off running the car this
year and see about putting a
Tremec 3550 or T56 into it.
I'm not sure right now. But
I'm hurtin and tired and
filthy. (Maybe that last
part is why the x-wife left,
ya think?)
r
On 5/14/2012 3:16 PM, STILLFRANKSFAULT@xxxxxxx
wrote:
OMG, Your kidding
right ..............
how did you miss that
split. I could see if
there was a crack in
the case, but that's
huge.
Smokey
Mt Frank
In a message
dated 5/14/2012
3:01:03 P.M.
Eastern Daylight
Time, rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx
writes:
...the
transmission
ain't workin:
|