On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:12:21 +0200, Mohamed Ashraf <mohamed.ashraf.213@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Arvind S Raj <sraj.arvind@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Oscar Carballal Prego < >> oscar.carballal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:43:55 +0530, Arvind S Raj <sraj.arvind@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> > Hey everyone, >>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Oscar Carballal Prego < >>> > oscar.carballal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> >> It's an intended feature, but if you think it's not ok to have it >>> please >>> >> explain why :) >>> >> >>> > >>> > It could be abused-someone could invite random people to join the site >>> and >>> > we won't be able to determine who invited whom. Also, the person >>> > invited >>> > wouldn't know who invited him-I think people would like to know who >>> invited >>> > them to join; at least I would like to know :). >>> >>> You have a good point. We can't allow anonymous users to send >>> invitations >>> without any restriction. Let's move the email invitations to a private >>> zone. >>> >> >> Okay then. I've reported a ticket(#192) and created a pull request that >> fixes the issue too. >> >> I would like to add one thing that while email invitations should be only > for logged in users however sharing via facebook and twitter and other > social media sites shouldn't because the invitees already know who the > inviter is and I shouldn't expect everyone who wants to share the website > wants to use it or has a reason to. what do you think? I solved it today and modified the code to allow the use of social networks, but not of e-mail :) -- Móbil: (34) 620-734766 | oscar.carballal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cidadania Sociedade Cooperativa Galega Corredoira das Fraguas 5-1º esq. 15.703 Santiago de Compostela (A Coruña) Tfno.: (34) 981-589269 | www.cidadania.coop