[duxhelp] Re: [folds] code

  • From: "Jack Maartman" <jmaartman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:11:14 -0800

I am finding this whole argumentation a bit bewildering. Doesn't a folds
code indicate either two skipped line, or a line of dots across the width of
the paper.  Shouldn't this be user configurable, based on preference. Please
bare with me, as no doubt this has already been stated.  What about a
"letter template" where the code could be user defined, <smile>.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Bell" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: [duxhelp] Re: [folds] code


> Yes, Susan, but what about those of us in Europe who use 12
> inch deep paper which can hold up to 29 Lines?
>
> Or even David on this list who uses 13 inch deep paper.
>
> I know it's a difficult concept, but there is life outside
> of North America.  (smile)
>
> George.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Susan
> Sent: 28 March 2006 18:25
> To: duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [duxhelp] Re: [folds] code
>
> FWIW, MegaDots uses a line of dots 2-5 across braille lines
> 9 and 18 and with 8-1/2" width paper fits a business
> envelope perfectly.
>
> Susan
>
>
> Peter Sullivan wrote on 3/28/2006, 10:45 AM:
>
> Michael,
>
> We are looking to avoid alogrithms that produce three
> different sizes of section. We're aiming instead for an
> alogrithm that, regardless of the number of folds, will
> produce sections of at most two different sizes.
>
> There seems to be some disagreement about how to distribute
> the larger and smaller sections, when the sections aren't
> all of the same size.
>
> Mike is looking for a way to make this something that the
> end user can set. So far, we have two preferences:
>
> 1. Put the larger section(s) first -- the smaller section(s)
> following.
> 2. Put the smaller section(s) first -- the larger section(s)
> following.
>
> So far, nobody has requested the larger or smaller
> section(s) be placed in the middle. This is good -- the
> fewer variations there are in preference, the more easily we
> can understand and adapt to them.
>
> However, let me point out a wrinkle that nobody else has
> pointed out so far.
>
> If you have an even number of sections greater than two --
> perhaps because you've requested three fold lines (thus four
> sections) -- I posit that you would want, if possible, to
> have the fold lines arranged symmetrically on the page. This
> would make it possible to fold once down the middle, and
> once again at the now-coincident remaining fold lines.
>
> We wouldn't get this by putting the larger fold section(s)
> consistently at the top or at the bottom. A recursive
> algorithm is necessary to manage such a case well.
>
> All of which is to beg your patience -- and that of others
> -- as we try to tease out a specification on this one. We've
> put our thinking caps on too.
>
> - Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
> Surato
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:15 AM
> To: duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [duxhelp] Re: [folds] code
>
> Correct, I would want the largest section to be at the top
> of the page.
> Ideally, I would want the smallest section to be at the
> bottom of the page. This would produce a page that has the
> first line or so outside of the folded section, and still
> have a neat fold.
>
> If the algorithm produces 3 different size sections, I would
> want the largest at the top, and the smallest at the bottom.
> If there are 2 equal size sections, and 1 larger section, I
> would want the larger section at the top. If there are 2
> equal size sections, and 1 smaller section, I would want the
> smaller section at the bottom.
>
>
> * * *
> * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org.
> * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
> *   unsubscribe
> * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may
> also
> * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other
> subscription
> * options by visiting http://www.freelists.org.  The list
> archive
> * is also located there.
> * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
> * * *
> * * *
> * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org.
> * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
> *   unsubscribe
> * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also
> * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription
> * options by visiting http://www.freelists.org.  The list archive
> * is also located there.
> * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
> * * *

* * *
* This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org.
* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
*   unsubscribe
* as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also
* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription
* options by visiting http://www.freelists.org.  The list archive
* is also located there.
* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
* * *

Other related posts: