Hi Peter, I would tend to lean towards Read/Write all the time with "PermissionsCustomized=1" if customizations are present and add the entry in the registry branch upon install of DBT "PermissionsCustomized=0". The fewer changes to the registry the better. As for the Guest Account, is it possible to let the user change the values for a particular instance of DBT but not write the changes? This would allow temporary changes to the emboss settings for any user. What do you think? Best Regards, Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Sullivan" <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: [duxhelp] Re: Unable to emboss > Kevin (Sean, Mark, et al), > > Resolved: We'll make the embosser branch of the registry read/write for all. > (I will leave it read-only for Guest account unless I hear a shout about > that.) An administrator will be able to change rights in the usual way, of > course, should there be a need to be more restrictive or a need to allow > Guest write access. > > But one question remains: at what point shall we set rights to the registry > branch? I suggest setting them only as the branch is created. This > prevents DBT overwriting any customizations that you may have to set by > hand. However, it also means that current installations won't be fixed when > we post a new build of DBT. Rather, you would have to remove the registry > branch (using regedit) and then re-create all of your embosser > configurations. > > The obvious alternative is to set permissions every time the branch is used. > This, however, would be dangerous in that any administrative use of the > machine with DBT would cause any permissions customizations to be lost. > > Another alternative would be to overwrite rights settings always, if we can, > unless we find a specific value (e.g. PermissionsCustomized=1) in the > registry branch. You would then want to add this value if you customize > permissions for some reason. > > A final alternative would be similar. We could overwrite right settings > always, if we can, unless we find a specific value (e.g. > PermissionsInitialized=1) in the registry branch. We would ourselves write > this value, so that your customizations would be preserved unless you > eliminate the setting. > > I could use some idea of which of these approaches would cause you the least > hassle. > > - Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Loeffler, Kevin J. > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:36 PM > To: duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [duxhelp] Re: Unable to emboss > > Mark and all, > > Yes, we are running the build from 24-May-2004. I just tried to set the > embosser profiles on one of our desktops running under the Administrator > account and had no problems. I was able to save the global embosser setup > and a document embosser setup with a test file. > > Does everybody else running XP use their systems under an administrative > account? Does the latest build of Duxbury require administrative access to > some of its' > components? After I > installed the beta on our machines, I specifically went and assigned full > permissions (to the Users group) on the Dbtdocs and Duxbeta folders as well > as "C:\Windows\Duxbury.ini" in order to make sure our users could change > settings. From what I learned above, it would appear that there may be > other restrictions in place under XP that I need to circumvent to allow > users to run the program and make settings changes. > > Ironically, our XP systems are not locked down as well as our NT 4 systems > were with v10.4, so I don't understand why there would be a permissions > problem under XP. > If use of the latest > build of Duxbury requires administrative access to some component, then this > will be a problem for users in a corporate environment. I certainly won't > grant all of our users administrative access to our systems - that defeats > the whole security mechanism of XP. > It is possible that I > have enabled some security feature that slips the mind at present and that > none of the other beta testers have done so, although I don't really think > that this is the case (but I've been wrong before). Is any body else > running the beta under XP in a domain (and NOT logging on with an account > that has administrative privileges)? > > Kevin-- > > -----Original Message----- > From: duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Mark Mercer > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:01 PM > To: duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [duxhelp] Re: Unable to emboss > > Hi Kevin, > > I was able to install the Thiel Impacto 600 as a share with no problem under > Windows XP Home and Windows 2000 Professional. I'll check with Windows XP > PRO. The dbt.elt file for beta 3 limits the lines per page for the Impacto > 600 to 25, so I can't setup DBT exactly as you have yours. Are you sure > about the latest beta build Monday, May 24, 2004? I had a problem in beta 2 > in the device settings tab and the only way to get out was to cancel and > that removed the embosser. > > Best Regards, > Mark > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loeffler, Kevin J." <loeffler@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:46 AM > Subject: [duxhelp] Re: Unable to emboss > > > > With or without a file open, select Global->Embosser Setup. Click on > > New. Create a new setup > > name (i.e., THIEL). Set the Embosser Model to Thiel Impacto 600, > select > > Send to printer (our > > share is \\server\Thiel). Change to the Device Settings tab and set > the > > rightmost cell placement > > to 42, click OK. Set Lines per page to 26 and check the Emboss in > > Interpoint checkbox. Click OK. > > > > Opening up the Global->Embosser Setup menu immediately after the above > > shows NO embosser listed > > in the setup listing. The same applies for creating an embosser setup > > entry using Document-> > > Embosser Setup (with a file open, obviously). > > > > Kevin-- > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:duxhelp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of David Holladay > > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:36 AM > > To: duxhelp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [duxhelp] Re: Unable to emboss > > > > I am not familiar with any reports of "missing embosser > configurations". > > Many have complained of the inability to delete the last > configuration. > > Could you be specific as to the steps you take to get to this > > frustrating > > situation? > > > > -- David Holladay > > > > > > At 10:28 AM 6/7/2004 -0500, you wrote: > > >I have several users who have (a) opened old Duxbury files and (b) > > >created new files in > > >the latest beta build who are unable to emboss at all. Both the > global > > >and document > > >embosser settings disappear immediately after being created. I've > had > > >the users save > > >the document after setting the embossers up and then reopen it and > the > > >embossers are > > >nowhere to be found. Opening up the embosser settings (either one) > > >immediately after > > >creating the profile reverts back to no embosser configured. Am I > > >missing something, or > > >is anyone else running into this problem? We are running Windows XP > > Pro > > >and use a networked > > >Thiel Impacto 600 (which doesn't matter - setting the embosser to use > > >LPT1 also results in > > >a lost embosser profile). > > > > > >Kevin-- > > > > > >----------------------------------- > > >Kevin J. Loeffler > > >System Administrator > > >TAEVIS > > >Purdue University > > >509 Harrison Street > > >West Lafayette, IN 47907-2025 > > >Office phone: (765) 496-2856 > > >Email: loeffler@xxxxxxxxxx > > >http://www.taevisonline.purdue.edu > > > > > >* * * > > >* This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > > >* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > > >* unsubscribe > > >* as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > > >* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other > subscription > > >* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > > >* is also located there. > > >* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > > >* * * > > > > > * * * > > * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > > * unsubscribe > > * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > > * is also located there. > > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > > * * * > > > > > > * * * > > * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > > * unsubscribe > > * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > > * is also located there. > > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > > * * * > > * * * > * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > * unsubscribe > * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > * is also located there. > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > * * * > > > * * * > * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > * unsubscribe > * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > * is also located there. > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > * * * > > * * * > * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > * unsubscribe > * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > * is also located there. > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > * * * * * * * This message is via list duxhelp at freelists.org. * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with * unsubscribe * as the subject to <duxhelp-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive * is also located there. * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com * * *