[dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- From: jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:01:32 US/Eastern
Nah, we can assume he relayed it. :)
>
> So will Faceous be able to relay
this information to the group, or
> will it come through role-playing?
>
> jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Oops - mouth zipping shut. Will
say no
> > more. :) OK, maybe I should. We're
> > not DMing here, so I'll say that it
> > comes to you from Faceus himself.
Only
> > those who are currently played in
the
> > active group (or those who replace
> > them) will be eligible for godhood.
> >
> > That knowledge may resolve much of
the
> > convolution problem - the group can
be
> > structured as you (the players) see
> > fit. I want to resist saying why
this
> > is so; even party members who are
dead
> > will still be eligible if they meet
one
> > particular criteria - and everyone
you
> > played in the fight last night
already
> > meets it.
> >
> > So far, everyone else doesn't.
> >
> > >
> > > Nadan doesn't want to be a
god,
> > but I don't care if he becomes one.
> > > It would certainly get the guy
out of
> > the way. :)
> > > I assume you mean just the
> > characters we are currently playing?
> > >
> > > jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hopefully, next week should
serve to
> > > > shed some light on where things
are
> > > > headed. Believe it or not, the
> > road to
> > > > godhood is already being paved -
for
> > > > better or for worse.
> > > >
> > > > Let me take this opportunity to
ask
> > an
> > > > important question: does anyone
> > have a
> > > > character in the current group
that
> > > > they do not want to see become a
> > god?
> > > > (Important: I'm not saying this
in
> > > > terms of what the character
wants,
> > but
> > > > in terms of what the player
wants).
> > > >
> > > > In the end, instead of failing,
the
> > > > characters might find a divine
> > destiny
> > > > to be unavoidable.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In the end, what will
really
> > > > disappoint or upset me is an
ending
> > > > > that doesn't allow us a
chance to
> > > > retire these characters. Do I
hope
> > > > > that they will become gods?
Yes I
> > > > do. I am so excited about
writing
> > > > > these guys and girls up as
> > deities!
> > > > I can't wait! However, if it
> > > > > doesn't happen, it doesn't
happen.
> > > > As long as it doesn't end
stupidly.
> > > > > Let me put it another
way. I
> > > > don't want the end to be
something
> > > > > contrived. So far you have
never
> > > > gone in the direction I
intended,
> > yet
> > > > > you have continued to do
things
> > that
> > > > made sense and were lots of
fun. I
> > > > > have faith you will keep doing
> > that.
> > > > >
> > > > > jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 1. I had to chuckle when
you
> > > > brought
> > > > > > up the fact that NPCs give
such
> > > > > > constant abuse to
characters. I
> > > > hadn't
> > > > > > thought of that, and had to
> > respond
> > > > > > without reading the rest.
Very
> > good
> > > > > > point! As for Elminster, he
> > had a
> > > > lot
> > > > > > on his mind: powerful
wizards
> > > > seeking
> > > > > > godhood, vast sources of
power
> > > > leaking
> > > > > > into the realms, etc etc.
A bit
> > > > harsh,
> > > > > > but in line for him (at
least
> > from
> > > > what
> > > > > > I've read over the years).
> > I'll now
> > > > > > read the next section:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. I'm getting a sense of
> > relief
> > > > from
> > > > > > reading section 2 as well.
For
> > some
> > > > > > reason, I just don't have a
> > problem
> > > > > > with Baish! I should, and I
> > > > remember
> > > > > > the character giving you
> > tremendous
> > > > > > headaches as a DM. I think
I've
> > > > hit on
> > > > > > a "aha!" moment here: I'm
> > really
> > > > > > overwhelmed by roleplaying
> > > > spellcasters
> > > > > > in 3rd edition, not by
character
> > > > > > personalities. It was
reeeallly
> > > > tough
> > > > > > running both Amrikals and
not
> > having
> > > > > > them annihilate everyone and
> > > > everything
> > > > > > around them. I just don't
have
> > a
> > > > firm
> > > > > > enough grasp of 3rd edition
> > magic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3. Yes, it does make
sense. I
> > left
> > > > > > last night mentioning two
> > things to
> > > > > > Matt and Damon: (1) How to
DM
> > your
> > > > > > powerful characters (which
we
> > > > discussed
> > > > > > today), and (2) how
terrified I
> > am
> > > > of
> > > > > > this plot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm loving it, and I'm glad
> > everyone
> > > > > > else is having fun, but
there's
> > > > bound
> > > > > > to be some controversy from
what
> > > > > > happens next! As each week
> > > > progresses,
> > > > > > the danger level is going
to go
> > up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some of that "controversy"
> > concern
> > > > > > comes from my knowledge of
> > things to
> > > > > > come that won't necessarily
be
> > > > popular
> > > > > > with the players - the
events
> > might
> > > > > > even come across as a "wet
> > blanket"
> > > > of
> > > > > > sorts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For example, Gadget and
Faceus
> > > > weren't
> > > > > > captured by Mylena - Tyr
sent
> > them.
> > > > > > They both have a specific
> > mission:
> > > > > > Faceus to prevent the group
from
> > > > > > succeeding, and Gadget to
deal
> > with
> > > > > > Klaw.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For an example of what
concerns
> > me,
> > > > > > I'll mention one idea now
that I
> > > > won't
> > > > > > use in play: I considered
> > having
> > > > the
> > > > > > gods send a messenger to the
> > Riders
> > > > in
> > > > > > Sigil. They could return of
> > their
> > > > own
> > > > > > volition, or sacrifice all
godly
> > > > aid.
> > > > > > That would mean no spells or
> > > > abilities
> > > > > > for any of the priests,
among
> > other
> > > > > > things. But I've thought
of a
> > > > > > different, more democratic
way
> > that
> > > > > > they will handle the
problem,
> > and it
> > > > > > ain't going to be pretty
> > either! :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's why I feel like
taking
> > these
> > > > > > things to their logical
> > conclusions
> > > > is
> > > > > > going to make me as much a
> > dreaded
> > > > DM
> > > > > > as Dan Robinetti.
> > > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- From: Johnathan Detrick
Other related posts:
- » [dungeoncrawl] Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- » [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- [dungeoncrawl] Re: Thursday morning summary
- From: Johnathan Detrick