[dungeoncrawl] Re: Baish/Angelo
- From: jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:18:18 US/Eastern
I like everything I've read so far, and
if anything bothered me slightly, it's
far more convenient with my schedule
today to just say "sure". :)
With that in mind, I wanted to throw an
idea out. Let's say that Ambrosia
suggested Sharess, and the idea was
quickly shelved.
Due to the depth of her involvement
with that goddess, I could see an
alternative coming about (if the group
approves) - she could split into two
goddesses.
One, an intermediate power, would be as
described - another, a demipower, would
be much like Sharess (but slightly
different, of course). That would be
the catlike one, and the more powerful
one would be focused on freedom,
creativity, inspiration, etc
(does "morning" fit in with this
portfolio?).
It would really be her in both
incarnations, but they'd function
independently (and simultaneously?).
> I wish I had more time to participate
in the discussion. I just have so
> much going on at work right now, that
it's hard to find the time. However,
> I am really looking forward to the
28th, so that we can get some of these
> things nailed down.
>
> If I find some time, I'll get to that
email that I said that I would send
> out on my characters. I like what
you and Jim have put forth on your
> characters/NPC's so far, so I'm going
to try and put something together for
> mine.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnathan Detrick
[mailto:jdetrick@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002
11:08 AM
> To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re:
Baish/Angelo
>
>
>
> Oh, good thinking. Honor is a
great idea!
> This is why I like collaborative
efforts. Honor makes perfect sense,
> but I
> hadn't thought of it. Or yesterday,
when Jim suggested the whole
> Carpathia-Mileena-Ancalagon thing
(can you tell I like that idea?), which
> got
> me all excited.
> I hadn't really wanted Angelo as
a deity, but I think the idea is so
> neat
> that I'd like to do it. Jim and I
talked briefly last night, and I know he
> doesn't have a problem with other
characters as deities, as long as they
> make
> sense and are interesting. Of
course, we just need to get everyone
else to
> agree that they are interesting. :)
> By the way, in case you hadn't
noticed, I'm toning down the number of
> e-mails I'm sending. I don't want to
overwhelm everyone, and I want
> everyone
> to participate. I'll be sending
things out as I think of them, and on
the
> 28th
> we can nail down some definites.
Until that time, I encourage everyone to
> speak up when they have time. I will
be sending out shorter e-mails when
> neat
> ideas (at least, neat to me) occur to
me.
>
> Damon Kline wrote:
>
> > I could see Baish as a Greater God
of warfare, combat and the patron of
> > gladiators. Perhaps some other
things thrown in, but definitely those.
> He
> > would definitely speak up for
Angelo and he would make sure that he
had a
> > place as a deity. If someone like
Ao interceded and wouldn't allow Angelo
> > to be a God for some reason, Baish
would make him a very powerful agent of
> > his order. I like the portfolio
that you suggested for Angelo, it
> > definitely seems to fit. Perhaps
adding "Honor in Combat" to his
> portfolio
> > as well.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johnathan Detrick
[mailto:jdetrick@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002
10:07 AM
> > To: Riders II
> > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Baish/Angelo
> >
> > Damon (and everyone else),
> > I've been thinking. I believe
Baish would be great as a greater God
> > of warfare and gladiatorial
combat. We could throw some other
things
> > in, but those would be the big'uns.
> > Do you think he would speak up
for Angelo? He did when the whole
> > shebang started. What would you
think of Angelo as a Lesser God that
> > reports directly to Baish? I see
his portfolio as being Martial Skill,
> > Discipline and Obedience.
> > Jim got me started when he
allied Mileena, Carpathia and Ancalagon
> > the way he did (well, allied may be
a strong word, but they have a
> > relationship). I like the idea of
doing this. It would also be like if
> > Sir Baran works for Faceous.
Relationships like that are always fun.
> > Just an idea. What does the
group think?
> > John
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
