[drivingpairs] Re: responses

  • From: "AConnors" <aconnors@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <drivingpairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:15:25 -0400

Yeah, after all, we did send them "canned messages!" (At least I did...copy
& paste...)
Anne
----- Original Message -----
From: <Hzlax@xxxxxxx>
To: <drivingpairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:10 PM
Subject: [drivingpairs] responses


> In a message dated 7/3/2003 12:27:17 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > From: "drivingpairs" <drivingpairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [drivingpairs] responses
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 09:59:25 -0500
> >
> > Tsk, tsk, tsk......canned replies.
> > At present it seems as though replies to our emails are identical, which
> > means they aren't directly answering each one.   Hmmmm.
> >
> > Helen
> >
>
> Friends, give them a break about the "canned" replies. You wanted to
"flood"
> them with e-mails, so accept the "canned" replies. That's still a whole
lot
> better and nicer than no replies, and hey, they say they are working on
it. What
> else can they write you at this time while they are working on it?
> Hardy
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> To Unsubscribe, change to Digest or Vacation mode go to:
> http://www.drivingpairs.com/dpmem.html
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>


_________________________________________________________
To Unsubscribe, change to Digest or Vacation mode go to: 
http://www.drivingpairs.com/dpmem.html
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Other related posts: