[drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- From: Hzlax@xxxxxxx
- To: drivingpairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:00:43 EDT
In a message dated 5/9/2003 12:22:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I don't want my ponies responding to a cluck made by someone else,
Mine can differentiate quite correctly if it's my voice or somebody else's.
In addition, with mine there is also the rein contact, and as described, the
half halt that starts the upward transition so somebody else's cluck without
my half halt shouldn't mean anything to them. Besides, yours can
differentiate that very well too, otherwise your next statement wouldn't work
either, or what would happen if somebody else says "ho"? :-)
>
>
> And "Ho" ALWAYS means "stop and do not move at all." It doesn't mean "slow
>
> down a little" or "slow down a lot this time" or "almost stop" or "stop for
>
> three seconds before inching off again" ... it means STOP!!! AND YOU
> DON'T
> *** EVEN *** MOVE UNTIL I LET YOU!!!
>
That's fine, however, in stopping just with a verbal command I see the
following problem: When you say "Ho", from that very moment that the word
leaves your mouth to the time that they stop, you have turned the execution
of your command over to your ponies, unless you do it also with the reins.
Otherwise from that moment on, you are not in charge, but they are. You have
no influence if they stop right here, on a dime, or two feet from here, or 6
feet from here. You have no precision anymore and leave it up to them in what
kind of a mood they are today, if they execute your command immediately when
they are very alert, or perhaps a little slower when they are not in such
high state of alertness. And since they are animals and not machines, there
will be variation in their mood, and with that variation, there will be
differences how quickly they react. For driving down the road, no problem,
who cares, if they stop right here, or a foot later. But for halting in the
dressage arena at X or a C, it does make a difference.
So in order to have precision in the execution, instead of a verbal command
(which then turns the execution over to them) I bring them to the halt with
my reins (bt have no problem if one uses a verbal command in addition to help
with that as a little extra, only personally I don't see a need for it), by
just holding them with more contact and guiding them through the downward
transition to the halt, with my hands in the reins exactly as I guide my car
to a halt with my foot on the brake. So as the mood of my horses may be
different from day to day, I feel exactly how much contact I need to take
today, the same as we all feel exactly how much we must step on the brake
pedal today to come to the halte exactly at the stop sign, not a foot earlier
and not a foot later, regardless if we stop with the car uphill, where we
need less foot on the brake or downhill, where we need more foot on the
brake. We don't even have to think about that anymore, it has become second
nature, and we are able to vary the pressure with our foot enough on the
brake pedal
to always come to the stop precisely where we want to even under all
different conditions. I try to do the same with my hands in the reins.
Hardy
_________________________________________________________
To Unsubscribe, change to Digest or Vacation mode go to:
http://www.drivingpairs.com/dpmem.html
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
- Follow-Ups:
- [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- From: Anewton
Other related posts:
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Voice Commands
- » [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- [drivingpairs] Re: Voice Commands
- From: Anewton