[dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Ben Coburn <btcoburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:59:52 -0800
On Feb 7, 2007, at 9:26, Martin Tschofen wrote:
Sounds like an amazing system.
Let me play devil's advocate though.
Is the benefit worth the effort?
[...]
*Maintain plugins as a community. That may really address the crux of
the matter. But that's the hardest one to deal with as it depends on
those pesky humans. Perhaps this is more about putting them into a
common version control system e.g. darcs, freshmeat, sourceforge.
Following this line of thinking... I wonder if there are any opensource
multi-project management systems that have a clean enough user
interface for "normal users" to easily find plugin projects? With
something like that, each plugin could be treated as a mini-project.
However, an existing tool would have to be *very* close to what we want
or adjusting it will be more work than rolling our own....
Regards, Ben Coburn
-------------------
silicodon.net
-------------------
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- Follow-Ups:
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Chris Smith
- References:
- [dokuwiki] plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Jay Dickon Glanville
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Chris Smith
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Martin Tschofen
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- » [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
Sounds like an amazing system. Let me play devil's advocate though. Is the benefit worth the effort? [...]*Maintain plugins as a community. That may really address the crux of the matter. But that's the hardest one to deal with as it depends on those pesky humans. Perhaps this is more about putting them into a common version control system e.g. darcs, freshmeat, sourceforge.
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Chris Smith
- [dokuwiki] plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Jay Dickon Glanville
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Chris Smith
- [dokuwiki] Re: plugins, and their 'activity' / 'maintenance'
- From: Martin Tschofen