[dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- From: Martin Høy <marhoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:33:22 +0100
On 12/15/05, Martin Tschofen <martin.tschofen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From a documentation perspective (what we use a wiki for) hierarchical
> breadcrumbs make much more sense. From a user's perspective I believe
> it makes sense too as they help the user understand how the content is
> organized.
>
> The current bread crumbs are the same as your history which anybody
> can access easily from the browser's tool bar.
>
> It would be great if this would be a config option to choose. So we
> could select either.
> --
> DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
> http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
This is turning into a vote, and for what it's worth, I'm also all for
hierarchical
breadcrumbs. If it's not the default, it should at least be a config-option.
Our documentation-wiki also makes wide use of namespaces, and we also
use the "sidebar" template with a separate sidebar for each namespace.
One of features (and "selling arguments") that separates DokuWiki from other
wikis is the possibility of having namespaces. And thus it seems strange not to
take full advantage of this feature.
Regards,
Martin
--
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- References:
- [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- From: Daniel Mitchell
- [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- From: Martin Tschofen
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- » [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- From: Daniel Mitchell
- [dokuwiki] Re: [patch] You Are Here
- From: Martin Tschofen