-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, John Madden wrote: >>However I'm not sure how this should be approached in the correct way. >>Accessing a database in an efficient manner is very different to the way of >>doing it on the filesystem... >> >>I'm open for suggestions and patches. > > > I'd vote to avoid "supporting MySQL" and instead supporting one of the > DB-independent abstraction layers that allow the user to choose from a > broader range of backends. Once you've gone Postgres, you never go back; I > personally find the amount of software out there that takes a > MySQL-or-nothing approach frustrating. Agree (to some extent). But still making a mysql version would be a good start in creating a more universal DB-based version. It's only five to ten DB-accessing functions, and if these have been tested using mysql, they'll be easily translated to any other system. (I need a working solution fast, so I'll start with mysql, but can still improve that once it's debugged and tested.) Cheers, Mario -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC46iTdr6lwuqb+oIRAsYEAJ4pgjpD9k8NqJcfVtsqTn17VkyfsQCfWo3m OVU2wkK43jF2JogOqzpCU4Y= =KXSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist