[dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Ruslan Zasukhin <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:44:25 +0200
On 12/15/05 1:12 PM, "Samuel Degrande" <Samuel.Degrande@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I was wondering if anyone else was looking for WYSIWYG fonctionality,
>>> if there were other interesting solutions besides wikiwyg or if
>>> anybody actually succeeded in including WYSIWYG edition (wikiwyg or
>>> other) into DokuWiki?
>>
>>
>> I've tested all the WYSIWYG editors and I've come to the conclusion that
>> it belongs on the client side.
>>
>> See this: http://www.hypercubed.com/projects/firefox/
>>
>> Rather than every project grappling with TinyMCE, which ain't too tiny,
>> or any other editor, we can use one that integrates well with our
>> browser and leave the driving to us.
>>
>> At least that's the way I see it.
>>
>
> but then, it will not be available to any platform/browser...
well, for example me care only about ability for FEW writers to write,
all rest READ and even cannot edit.
So that writers can easy use FireFox only
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- References:
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Samuel Degrande
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Samuel Degrande