[dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Marc-Andre Gaudreau <Marc-Andre.Gaudreau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:16:11 -0500
You're right. For example, wikiwyg works well with IE and
Firefox/Mozilla. However, it does not seem to work with Opera. I have
not tried other browsers. However, the project is still young. It
might support other browsers in the future.
Gina Haeussge wrote:
Samuel Degrande wrote:
Bert Garcia wrote:
Marc-Andre Gaudreau wrote:
I was wondering if anyone else was looking for WYSIWYG
fonctionality, if there were other interesting solutions besides
wikiwyg or if anybody actually succeeded in including WYSIWYG
edition (wikiwyg or other) into DokuWiki?
I've tested all the WYSIWYG editors and I've come to the conclusion
that it belongs on the client side.
See this: http://www.hypercubed.com/projects/firefox/
Rather than every project grappling with TinyMCE, which ain't too
tiny, or any other editor, we can use one that integrates well with
our browser and leave the driving to us.
At least that's the way I see it.
but then, it will not be available to any platform/browser...
That is a problem you'd also have with the WYSIWYG components. AFAIK
most if not all of them depend on Javascript (what if it's disabled?),
only focus on fully supporting IE and maybe also Firefox/Mozilla (if
you're lucky even Opera). So you are bound to get into trouble with
those as well if you use some non-mainstream-browser.
Just my 2ct.
Regards,
Gina
--
Marc-Andrà Gaudreau, analyste
Service des Technologies de l'Information
Università de Sherbrooke
(819) 821-8000 x 3416
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- References:
- [dokuwiki] WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Marc-Andre Gaudreau
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Bert Garcia
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Samuel Degrande
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Gina Haeussge
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- » [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
Samuel Degrande wrote:
Bert Garcia wrote:
Marc-Andre Gaudreau wrote:
I was wondering if anyone else was looking for WYSIWYG fonctionality, if there were other interesting solutions besides wikiwyg or if anybody actually succeeded in including WYSIWYG edition (wikiwyg or other) into DokuWiki?
I've tested all the WYSIWYG editors and I've come to the conclusion that it belongs on the client side.
See this: http://www.hypercubed.com/projects/firefox/
Rather than every project grappling with TinyMCE, which ain't too tiny, or any other editor, we can use one that integrates well with our browser and leave the driving to us.
At least that's the way I see it.
but then, it will not be available to any platform/browser...
That is a problem you'd also have with the WYSIWYG components. AFAIK most if not all of them depend on Javascript (what if it's disabled?), only focus on fully supporting IE and maybe also Firefox/Mozilla (if you're lucky even Opera). So you are bound to get into trouble with those as well if you use some non-mainstream-browser.
Just my 2ct.
Regards, Gina
-- Marc-Andrà Gaudreau, analyste Service des Technologies de l'Information Università de Sherbrooke (819) 821-8000 x 3416 -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- [dokuwiki] WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Marc-Andre Gaudreau
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Bert Garcia
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Samuel Degrande
- [dokuwiki] Re: WYSIWYG edition?
- From: Gina Haeussge