[dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Martin <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:25:40 +0100
On Thursday 24 July 2008 17:47:05 Andreas Gohr wrote:
>
> Yes, adding some tags or icons to classify content might be a good idea.
>
> > - Some guidelines should be given so that review of pages will be done in
> > a more standard way.
>
> Agreed, see my suggestion of an explanation page in my other mail.
>
> > - Once all or most pages are commented, hopefully mainly with an OK tag,
> > review comments to have a better view of what can be improved and how it
> > could be improved.
>
> We should only tag non-okay pages ;-)
I think we should actually encourage the use of tags, but maybe limit it to a
number of permitted tags each with designed purposes.
Using tags to classify pages (e.g. "plugin", "template", "development")
instead of just their state (which I think is also a good use of tags) means
we can get the best of both worlds by having a relatively flat structure, but
also allowing pages to be easily categorised (the main purpose, in my view,
of a deeply nested structure) and more importantly to spot connections
between pages that might not immediately be obvious.
It might require a change to the tags plugin to only allow pre-defined tags,
if we decide to do it that way. But I think we might get more benefit by
allowing free tagging; but with some tags reserved for specific uses.
For example, if someone came looking for an OpenID plugin, then if that were
also a tag they'd easily find the authentication backend, maybe rendering
plugin, or a template that provides additional features etc.
Just my tuppence worth of thoughts.
--Martin
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
- Follow-Ups:
- [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Colin LORRAIN
- References:
- [dokuwiki] Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Colin LORRAIN
- [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Andreas Gohr
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Colin LORRAIN
- [dokuwiki] Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Colin LORRAIN
- [dokuwiki] Re: Proposals for a cleanup on the splitbrain wiki
- From: Andreas Gohr