> Since the edits I did 2 days ago, I tried to find a more consensual way to > clean up the wiki somewhat. So here is what I'd like to propose : ahh and I just hit send for my proposal :-) > 1. Don't make big changes, review and comment... I agree in general, though a big restructuring could make sense (see my other mail). > - We may think about a way to add comments to pages so that we can review > all pages and "tag" them as OK or not, and if not add comments. A review > should include a tag like 'OK' or 'NOK' + comments + signature + date. > - This is by now done by the FIXME icon, but this should be done in a more > structured way. Yes, adding some tags or icons to classify content might be a good idea. > - Some guidelines should be given so that review of pages will be done in a > more standard way. Agreed, see my suggestion of an explanation page in my other mail. > - Once all or most pages are commented, hopefully mainly with an OK tag, > review comments to have a better view of what can be improved and how it > could be improved. We should only tag non-okay pages ;-) > - Biggest part of modifications should not break links, however, when a > section of a page is moved to a new page, a link to that new page should be > added. backlinks probably need to be fixed manually... this works okay for smaller changes... > - A page that has to be moved should be moved with a special plugin that > updates backlinks and avoids dead links (See below for a proposal on how to > do that). ... I like to avoid to rely on any additional plugins we might need to write. > - Add namespace templates where it could be useful, and perhaps include, > commented, the guidelines that apply to the namespace where the page is > edited. agreed, however as I wrote in my other mail I want to avoid too much namespaces. > - Disable page creation within the :wiki root (and maybe within some othe > namespaces), so that people will have to find the best place for their new > content. No, I want the docs to open for everyone. Keeping a flat hierarchy mostly avoids problems with pages in the "wrong" place and for the rest more experienced users can move them. > A way to avoid dead links on moved pages : > > To avoid dead links on moved page a feature could be added to the > versionning system. In the .changes file of a page (see wiki:changelog), we > could add a "MOVED" type. When a user come across an empty page, we should > look within the .changes file, if it exists, if the page has been moved, and > if so, we should redirect him to the new page. Also a 301 header could be > issued so that bots are informed of the change. Adding a page move feature might make sense. if any developer want to step forward and propose a patch, I open ;-) Andi -- splitbrain.org -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist