[dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: "Stephan Herrmann" <vlq@xxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:29:40 +0200
> Wow this is really bad. Maybe it's a broken GDLib. Quality is usually
> better even without imagemagick. How do other scaled images (smaller
> than original but bigger than this tiny thumbnail) look like?
They are all pretty much the same. As soon as GDlib starts working, they look
like that. A bigger thumb of the same file is attached.
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*. Nur noch kurze Zeit!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Attachment:
img_7876.jpg
Description: JPEG image
- Follow-Ups:
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- References:
- [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
- From: Stephan Herrmann
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Stephan Herrmann
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick