[dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: "Stephan Herrmann" <vlq@xxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:42:53 +0200
Hi,
> http://www.imagemagick.org - but I doubt you get it installed without
> shell access
That's the point. I tried to deploy this one by simply uploading it to my
webspace: http://seelo.net/dl/imagemagick-4.2.9_i386-static-1.tar.tar and there
is no error-message when I enter the path, but the pictures stay ugly.
Is there a way to increase quality of GDlib? When researching the net there
were no comments, that GDlib produce such poor quality.
An example is attached.
> > And how can I deploy it within my webspace?
>
> This is beyond the scope of this mailinglist
Of course it is.
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*. Nur noch kurze Zeit!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Attachment:
img_7876.jpg
Description: JPEG image
- Follow-Ups:
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Daniel Mitchell
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- References:
- [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
- From: Stephan Herrmann
- [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- From: Andreas Gohr
- [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick
- » [dokuwiki] Re: Imagemagick