> Owner would be a > special user(group) consisting of the user(s) who authored(contributed) to a page I think this has to be only the creator of the page, because otherwise with the ACL below: > and would be able to have their own access level defined. e.g. > namespace: @all read > namespace: @users read/create > namespace: @owner read/edit the only person that can be in the owner group for a page is the creator; there's no way for other people to edit it and thus get into the 'owner' group. (I think) Personally, I'd be wary of adding even more levels of ACL complexity to dokuwiki -- I already spend more time than I'd like fiddling with the ACL because people decide some projects are more secret than others, group X can read all of this project but only edit one particular page, etc. Making it even more complex seems like a recipe for greater confusion by people trying to use our wiki; as it stands, I can explain read/write permissions to people just fine, but trying to explain what a moderator is really isn't going to work. I suppose we could just ignore moderators entirely on our wiki (it's internal, so there's no spam problem), but it seems like if there's a way to resolve the underlying spam problem without complicating the ACL, that would be better. -- dan -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist