[dokuwiki] Re: About fckeditor and bug #535
- From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:26:14 -0400
Thanks for the comments Andi.
I was looking at what moinmoin does but I got stuck :(
I was thinking about allowing only simple html tags, like h1, h2, etc and
then parse the resulting html and convert '<br>' to '\\ ' and so on.
I hope I can get how moinmoin works.
Oliver
Andreas Gohr wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 13:48:59 -0400
"Oliver Schulze L." <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I was reading about implementing a WYSIWYG editor in DW.
I wonder if its ok to work on the implementation of the FCKeditor?
As far as I know nobody is working on it currently.
I don't want to work on it just to find out that the patch will not be
aproved.
I can not say if it will be approved or not until I see the code. But
here are a few things to think of:
- Integrating FCKeditor could be hard because it's an HTML editor, using
WIKIWYG is probably the better idea (there are some starting points at
the wiki)
- If you implement it, it should be optional and it should be possible
disable it on a per user basis (switching between WYSIWYG and usual
syntax editing on the fly)
- You should think how to handle syntax the editor doesn't understand
(eg. plugin syntax) - I have no idea how to do this you should see
what other Wikis do (MoinMoin has WYSIWYG editing)
Andi
--
Oliver Schulze L.
<oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
DokuWiki mailing list - more info at
http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist
Other related posts:
- » [dokuwiki] About fckeditor and bug #535
- » [dokuwiki] Re: About fckeditor and bug #535
- » [dokuwiki] Re: About fckeditor and bug #535
- » [dokuwiki] Re: About fckeditor and bug #535
- » [dokuwiki] Re: About fckeditor and bug #535
On Tue, 23 May 2006 13:48:59 -0400 "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I was reading about implementing a WYSIWYG editor in DW.
I wonder if its ok to work on the implementation of the FCKeditor?
As far as I know nobody is working on it currently.
I don't want to work on it just to find out that the patch will not be
aproved.
I can not say if it will be approved or not until I see the code. But here are a few things to think of:
- Integrating FCKeditor could be hard because it's an HTML editor, using WIKIWYG is probably the better idea (there are some starting points at the wiki) - If you implement it, it should be optional and it should be possible disable it on a per user basis (switching between WYSIWYG and usual syntax editing on the fly) - You should think how to handle syntax the editor doesn't understand (eg. plugin syntax) - I have no idea how to do this you should see what other Wikis do (MoinMoin has WYSIWYG editing)
Andi
-- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>