[discuss ifpsc] Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- From: IFPSC <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: discuss-ifpsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:46:10 -0500
FYI - some feedback from Richard Elliott
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager <ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Feb 2, 2008 10:17 AM
I think it is a reasonable subject, but I worry about the scope. The
molecules should be large enough and new enough that the experimental
values are not available in the literature. And there should be 10 of
them, covering a range of functionalities that might be interesting as
small pharmaceuticals, not just two.
JRE
- Follow-Ups:
- [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- From: Moore, Jonathan (J)
Other related posts:
- » [discuss ifpsc] Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- » [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- [discuss ifpsc] Re: Feedback requested re: 5th IFPSC proposal
- From: Moore, Jonathan (J)