[ddots-l] Re: update on the mac book firewire issue and a further question.

Hi.  Okay, thanks for the clarification.

Cameron.



-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sean A. Cummins
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:29 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: update on the mac book firewire issue and a further
question.

Not true,  The word length is only going to be 32 bit, but it will still 
address both processors.  Secondly, sonar will still utilize 64 bit internal

rendering on audio if the chip can support it.

Sean

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cameron" <cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] update on the mac book firewire issue and a further 
question.


> Hi.  Well, after disabling the firewire network adaptor, Bluetooth, and 
> the
> broad com device, I am no longer getting those drop outs with audio 
> playback
> on the mac book with the Tascam FW1884.  This is certainly a step in the
> right direction however, I'm only referring to playback of stereo files in
> winamp and other media players.  I haven't tried anything in sonar yet.
>
> Before I try loading a session and seeing how far I get, I have a 
> question.
> Being that windows xp sp3 is a thirty two bit operating system, I assume
> that it is only utilizing half of the 2.4gHz Intel core 2 duo processor. 
> If
> I enable the multi processing engine in sonar, will the application at 
> least
> use the other core as well?  I wanted to ask before trying as I don't want
> to cause something unwanted.
>
> I have not got a satisfactory answer in regards to having the TI firewire
> chip installed in my white mac book in place of the current chip without
> that modification voiding my Apple warranty.  The aluminum mac book pro is
> appealing for a bunch of reasons, but, even if I could afford it right 
> now,
> I can't really justify e baying my mint barely used mac book to upgrade. 
> It
> would be a financial loss and I don't think the gains warrant it.
>
> My last port of call is to call Apple directly on Monday which I may do
> either way because in any case, I'd like to know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cameron.
>
> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
> To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> unsubscribe
> For other list commands such as vacation mode,
> click on the immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
> send a message, to
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> faq
> 

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode, 
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
send a message, to 
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.11/1820 - Release Date: 11/29/2008
6:52 PM

PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode, 
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
send a message, to 
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq

Other related posts: