[ddots-l] Re: software vs hardware recording

BlankYes.  Mind you, I don't know which mixer you have so, can't comment on 
whether it has excellent pree-amps or, not.

Regards, Phil Muir

P J Muir Productions,
Music And Audio Production
Telephone: US (615) 713-2021  
UK+44-1747-821-794
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
URL:
www.philmuir.com/ 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Omar Binno 
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 2:02 PM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: software vs hardware recording


  Phil, when you say pre amps, do you mean external ones besides the actual 
ones within the mixer that I am using?

  Thanks.

  Omar Binno

  www.omarbinno.com
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Phil Muir 
    To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 8:54 AM
    Subject: [ddots-l] Re: software vs hardware recording


    Hmm, maybe as your keeping all of your software synthes/samples internal to 
Sonar.  On the other hand, if you had some really hi end pree-amps that you 
could use with your hardware then, you would find that your hardware would 
sound fatter and have more detail too!

    Regards, Phil Muir

    P J Muir Productions,
    Music And Audio Production
    Telephone: US (615) 713-2021  
    UK+44-1747-821-794
    Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
    E-mail:
    info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    URL:
    www.philmuir.com/ 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Omar Binno 
      To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 1:49 PM
      Subject: [ddots-l] software vs hardware recording


      Hello,

      I notice when I use vsts, or samples via the sfz in sonar, I actually get 
fatter, warmer, and louder recordings than when using tracks from an external 
synth like the motif. Is this generally the case, or am I imagining things here.

      Omar Binno

      www.omarbinno.com

GIF image

Other related posts: