[ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- From: "Phil Muir" <ddots@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:12:47 -0000
Gord, Herman had a corrupted project. It's all sorted out now, smile!
Regards, Phil Muir
P J Muir Productions
Music And Audio Production
URL:
http://www.philmuir.com/
Band website:
http://www.demuirs.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: Gordon Kent
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:19 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
Hello:
What kind of effects are you assigning to the sends? You should only use
sends for reverbs and delay effects, including chorus and flange. You would
not use them for eq, compression, gates, and the like. If you are, then you
are feeding dry signal into the sends which will return in the middle by
default. You could pan the send for a track, but there are other issues that
are undesirable when using sends for these kinds of effects.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: HF
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] panning confusion
I have a project with multiple audio tracks. I am using multiple effects
which I inserted on individual busses so I have multiple sends on tracks so I
can have maximum control. One effect per buss.
I have outputs from tracks sent to master, as well as all the different
busses. Where I am getting most confused about is that the pannings on
individual tracks do not work when the sends are on. If the sends are off I can
pan at will.
What am I missing or is this just normal behavior?
HF
- References:
- [ddots-l] panning confusion
- From: HF
- [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- From: Gordon Kent
Other related posts:
- » [ddots-l] panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- » [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- [ddots-l] panning confusion
- From: HF
- [ddots-l] Re: panning confusion
- From: Gordon Kent