Yep, been using it since Sound Forge XP 4 or something back in 1997. Before that, I used SoundEdit16 on the Mac. Crap, time flies. Bryan -----Original Message----- From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Dew Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 12:29 AM To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD I didn't realize that a blind person could use Sound Forge . Brian, maybe you could straighten me out. Cheers! Mark At 09:26 PM 10/21/2009 -0400, you wrote: >Maybe, but I still don't like doing fades and trimming in Sonar. It can >do it, but editing bus automation and doing trims and fades just takes way more key presses and fiddling in Sonar to get it right. Not saying that you can't do it, I just think Sound Forge is faster. > >Bryan > >-----Original Message----- >From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Muir >Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:39 PM >To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD > >they can be. On the other hand, I have tended to do all of my >mastering in Sonar. I can do that because I have access to the VU metres in Sonar which, is really cool! > > > >Regards, Phil Muir >Accessibility Training >Telephone: US (615) 713-2021 >UK+44-1747-821-794 >Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246 >E-mail: >info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ><mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >URL: >www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ ><http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> > > >-----Original Message----- >From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Studio Montebello >Sent: 22 October 2009 01:35 >To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD > > >Absolutely right Phil!!! >Sonar is primarely a tracking and mixing package and the metering >system caters to these features. >When tracking or mixing down, you're mostly interested in peak metering . >In my opinion and in my practice, mastering is better suited to >packages such as Sound Forge or Wave Lab where the metering systems are much more elaborate. >Jean > >Visitez mon site / Visit my site at http://www.studiomontebello.com > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Phil Muir" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 8:21 PM >Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD > > >> mastering. You really can check what's happening with the VU metres in >> alternative packages. Bryan, I know you work for DD but, check it out >and >> you will see what people are talking about. >> >> >> >> Regards, Phil Muir >> Accessibility Training >> Telephone: US (615) 713-2021 >> UK+44-1747-821-794 >> Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246 >> E-mail: >> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> URL: >> www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ >> <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On >> Behalf Of Bryan Smart >> Sent: 22 October 2009 01:07 >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> >> Though, if you're recording that instrument in stereo, and one of the >> channels clips, you'll need to lower the volume on both channels by >> the >same >> amount to preserve the stereo image, right? If you'll be lowering >> them >both >> by the same amount, it doesn't seem to matter which one clipped. If >> either of them clip, then they both need to be reduced by the same amount. >> >> If you're metering a stereo submix, and the submix clips, you have >> the individual track meters to rely upon. >> >> Same thing for the master bus. >> >> Stereo meters might be interesting tools, but I can't imagine any >> common scenarios where they're uniquely suited. >> >> Bryan >> >> _____ >> >> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >On >> Behalf Of luis elorza >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:28 PM >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> >> i agree entirely Brian, but there is a very common situation where >> you >have >> 2 mikes to record a single instrument and if you want to record it >> to a single track then you should be able to read both input >> channels. as every mike has a different output level. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Bryan Smart <mailto:bryansmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:14 PM >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> >> Maybe I misunderstood what he wants, or maybe you misunderstood. Anyway... >> >> If you release the lock and hold, then you have a mostly >> instantaneous report of the current signal strength. You are right >> that this isn't the traditional definition of a VU meter, but you are >> wrong that a VU meter measures "loudness". >> >> The difference between the instantaneous report and a traditional VU >> meter is that a VU meter is designed with a lag to eliminate abrupt changes. >> Roughly speaking, a VU meter will trend toward the average input over >> the last 300Ms or so. Sonar's meters don't respond in this way by >> default, but you can easily make them respond with any curves that >> you'd like by using the Audio Meter options dialog in the options menu. >> >> As to "loudness", the concept of loudness is very vague when we're >> talking about a recording, since we could be listening to that >> recording on tiny headphones or a huge PA. The only factors that >> matter in gauging the level of a recording is its relative strength >> when compared to another signal of fixed strength, and the dynamic >> range of the material (difference between the most quiet and most >> loud parts of the recording). In digital audio, >the >> maximum signal strength is 0DB, so the peak of your recording >> matters, and you'd use a peak meter for that. However, more important >> is the dynamic range of the recording. A narrow dynamic range makes >> the recording seem louder, and you'd measure that with an RMS meter. >> You can switch between these meter modes in the meter's context menu. >> >> CakeTalking is not able to report separate meters for the left and >> right channel of a stereo track. Instead, you hear a single meter >> that >represents >> the summed signal. In most situations, that is what most people care >about, >> since, if you're establishing level for a stereo signal, you rarely, >> if ever, wish to distort the stereo image by independently adjusting >> gain on the individual channels. >> >> Bryan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _____ >> >> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >On >> Behalf Of Studio Montebello >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:17 PM >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> >> Unlocking the peak meter hold doesn't make a peak meter a VU meter! >> A peak meter is what it says it measures the peak signal whereas a VU >meter >> measures the loudness, two different things. >> Jean >> >> Visitez mon site / Visit my site at http://www.studiomontebello.com >> <http://www.studiomontebello.com> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Bryan Smart <mailto:bryansmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:34 PM >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> But it can. If you open the meter context menu and deselect hold and >> lock peeks, then you'll have a continuously fluctuating, and mostly >> useless, vu meter. >> >> Not sure why people want a non-peek meter when it isn't possible for >> any screen reader to report every value that appears without driving >> you crazy with non-stop speech, but this method will let you have the >> experience of trying. >> >> Bryan >> >> _____ >> >> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >On >> Behalf Of Phil Muir >> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 2:39 PM >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: VU meters in DD >> >> >> No it doesn't. >> >> >> >> Regards, Phil Muir >> Accessibility Training >> Telephone: US (615) 713-2021 >> UK+44-1747-821-794 >> Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246 >> E-mail: >> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> URL: >> www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ >> <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On >> Behalf Of Christopher Bartlett >> Sent: 21 October 2009 18:37 >> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [ddots-l] VU meters in DD >> >> >> >> Previous iterations of Dancing Dots would report peak meters but not >> the running VU meters. Since Jsonar can do this, does Cake Talking >> do it now? >> >> >> >> Chris Bartlett >> >> >> >> >PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! >To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe >If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >and in the Subject line type >unsubscribe >For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq > > >PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! >To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >and in the Subject line type >unsubscribe >For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq > >PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! >To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectsubscribe >If this link doesn't work then send a message to: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >and in the Subject line type >unsubscribe >For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately >following link: >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to >ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq > > PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE! To leave the list, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type unsubscribe For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the immediately following link: ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or send a message, to ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type faq