[ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- From: "Greg Brayton" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:57:55 -0400
Well this is good to know since It's in the mail to me lol.
http://www.gbrayton.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Gordon Kent
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:05 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
Trilogy is by far the best library of bass sounds going. We can't really
alter parameters, but we can get at the huge selection of wonderful bass
sounds. It is well worth it.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Brayton
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:44 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Soft synth accessibility question
The stineberg hypersonic 2 is the most accessible soft synth I have. The
lounge lizard, and dimention pro are usable, but not nearly as nice. I know
when i upgrade to sonar 6 dimention will get better,
but i'd like to know what your using that's very user friendly. I was
thinking about getting trilogy. But if there's something that's real easy to
use I'd like to know about it.
Thanks for any feedback.
http://www.gbrayton.com
- References:
- [ddots-l] Soft synth accessibility question
- From: Greg Brayton
- [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- From: Gordon Kent
Other related posts:
- » [ddots-l] Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- » [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- [ddots-l] Soft synth accessibility question
- From: Greg Brayton
- [ddots-l] Re: Soft synth accessibility question
- From: Gordon Kent