[ddots-l] Re: Jaws with Cakewtalking VS Windows eyes with Nuendo

  yes, window-eyes requiers set files for nuendo.
set files consist in labelling graphics and define user windows.

they are not included in window-eyes. i've made them with a sighted friend.
so it's something experimental but works great.
shure it's possible to do the same with jaws, but scripts seem to be more 
complicated to create.

about sonar window-eyes has set files included, but never tried that soft.

  cake talking seems to be a good tool for using sonar with jaws but it's not 
really fair from freedom scientific.
should be included in jaws.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael Smith 
  To: DancingDots List 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:35 PM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Jaws with Cakewtalking VS Windows eyes with Nuendo


  Hi,

  It's probably not a good idea to discuss this on this list, but I'm not 
subscribed to other list for general midi list for the blind. Anyways, does 
anyone tried both Jaws with cakewalk and Windows eyes with nuendo? What are the 
advantages and disadvantages? Which one gives more freedom in terms of 
accessibility IE. plugins and audio editing? Does windows eyes require a 
special script like Jaws needs caketalking in order to access nuendo?
  It seem there are more people using nuendo than cakewalk, I wonder it's worth 
to learn it.

  MS

Other related posts: