[ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- From: "Gordon Kent" <dbmusic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 02:59:52 -0400
Phil:
If you are using asio, the latency slider in SOnar has no effect at all.
You set the latency from the properties window of the fa66's control pannel.
The disk i/o is set to 128 by default, which should be adequate for most
situations. Zero latency is really not something you are going to get with
realtime recording. Supposedly, the new audio format in vista will be
better than asio, we';ll have to see about that.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ddots-l" <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:06 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] I/O buffer size and latency
my sonar6 producer installation on an ADK laptop is set to a I/O buffer
size of 128(advanced page of audio options). The sonar default is
(according to the help files) 64.
I'm using the internal system drive for audio data(7200 rpm drive). I'm
wondering what the best setting for the I/O buffer size would be to
maximize latency and minimize dropouts. How does this variable affect
disk throughput, and with this kind of system drive, what might be a
better setting than 128KB?
Currently, I can record at 24 bits with minimally perceptable latency with
input echo on. Naturally, I'm trying for zero latency while recording
audio, but I start getting dropouts when I start cutting the latency
slider any further than 50% for the Edirol FA66(ASIO). Wouldn't recording
at 16 bits improve latency(50%less data throughput involved with 16bits
from 24bits).
I like the headroom and quality that comes from 24bits, but I want that
zero latency for obvious reasons. That's why I'm considering changing the
disk I/O buffer size--it seems to be the only variable left that might
improve performance.
.
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- Follow-Ups:
- [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- From: Damon Fibraio
- References:
- [ddots-l] I/O buffer size and latency
- From: Phil Halton
Other related posts:
- » [ddots-l] I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- » [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
I'm using the internal system drive for audio data(7200 rpm drive). I'm wondering what the best setting for the I/O buffer size would be to maximize latency and minimize dropouts. How does this variable affect disk throughput, and with this kind of system drive, what might be a better setting than 128KB?
Currently, I can record at 24 bits with minimally perceptable latency with input echo on. Naturally, I'm trying for zero latency while recording audio, but I start getting dropouts when I start cutting the latency slider any further than 50% for the Edirol FA66(ASIO). Wouldn't recording at 16 bits improve latency(50%less data throughput involved with 16bits from 24bits).
I like the headroom and quality that comes from 24bits, but I want that zero latency for obvious reasons. That's why I'm considering changing the disk I/O buffer size--it seems to be the only variable left that might improve performance.
. ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- [ddots-l] Re: I/O buffer size and latency
- From: Damon Fibraio
- [ddots-l] I/O buffer size and latency
- From: Phil Halton