[ddots-l] Re: Can I make by Sonar files smaller by....
- From: Bryan Smart <bryansmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:10:13 -0400
I think he's worried about nothing.
Kevin, do you realize that, at 24-bit, 96Khz, stereo, a 2TB hard drive has
enough room to record for over a thousand hours? If you can live with 16-bit,
44Khz, stereo, then that increases to over 3,300 hours, or over 137 days of
non-stop recording. I really think you'll be OK.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dave Carlson
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 8:53 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Can I make by Sonar files smaller by....
Kevin,
Since each of the cakewalk files either point to a sound file, or if you use a
CWB format, include an audio file, I would think that keeping it as mono, and
perhaps even at a lower bit rate or frequency would make it smaller. Why not
try one using different settings in the import and saving to see what happens?
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Gibbs <mailto:kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 15:33
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Can I make by Sonar files smaller by....
We're talking about drawers and drawers of casettes recorded between
the years 1970 and 1977. this wil involve multiple large drives eventually,
particularly if the material is organized with any thoroughness at all.
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Wicketts
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 3:41 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Can I make by Sonar files smaller by....
Hi Kevin,
Why not just store them as Wav files on a dedicated memory
stick.
Steve W
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Gibbs <mailto:kevjazz@xxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 8:14 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Can I make by Sonar files smaller
by....
Dear All,
Can I make my sonar files smaller by recording them
in mono? It seems that I should be able to do this. I have a ton of old
cassettes of my piano lessons from the 70s. They were recorded using a mono
cassette machine. If I switch interleve to mono, will I get a smaller file
size based on the idea that a stereo file at 16 bit 44.1 consumes 10MB per
minute and that a mono file should probably consume 5MB per minute? If
changing the interleve to mono isn't the way to do this, what is? Is there a
way to record this stuff and save it as a collection of CWB files that are
smaller than stereo files since the original source material isn't stereo
anyway?
Thanks,
Kevin
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
version of virus signature database 5139 (20100523) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq
Other related posts:
