[ddots-l] CT5 documents and proofreading

This is not meant as a criticism of the fine work David does, and the fine support given by Dancing Dots. However, I frequently find typos, awkward wording, or sentence fragments, capitalization inconsistencies, etc. in the CT5 documentation, as well as the Sibelius Speaking documentation. Is there any interest on behalf of Dancing Dots in fixing these things? I typically read these documents using refreshable Braille; I doubt I would notice most of them if I were using speech exclusively. Anyway, should I keep my proofread copies to myself or share them? I'm afraid I haven't been keeping a list of fixes, and I would have to start over again if such a list was necessary.

Chris
P.S. I must be a freak as I actually enjoy this sort of knit-picking! *grin*


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date: 7/24/2006


** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: