[dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship

Hello Michael,

congratulations! Priority override imminent :)

I spent an afternoon hacking together an Eclipse project of the dbdoclet
0.64.2 and managed to build a working version. This means I can fix some
things myself, and might be able to contribute some of them back to the
mainline if you think it would be useful. In any case there is now an
internal branch of 0.64.2 which will not be released outside the
company, of course.

So when you release 0.65, I will take a look at what is new from our
point of view and see if there is something to contribute. For example,
I need to start working on the constant field summary and the
classsynopsis parts, those are the most urgent.

--Jere

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dbdoclet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:dbdoclet-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Michael Fuchs
>Sent: 14 September, 2005 23:08
>To: dbdoclet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
>Subject: [dbdoclet] Re: Part/reference relationship
>
>Hello Jere,
>
>your bug is already fixed, but I am still working on the jdk 
>1.5 support.  Additionally two weeks ago I became the father 
>of twins, which delays the delivery of 0.65.0 :-)).  I hope it 
>will be finished in the end of october.
>
>Regards
>   Michael
> 
>Jere.Kapyaho@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>Hi Michael,
>>
>>any news on the fix for 0.65.0? 
>>
>>Actually there is a workaround, but it is very messy and must be 
>>duplicated for each package:
>>
>>1) Write the package description in DocBook XML.
>>2) Define a file entity in the main DocBook XML document, 
>referring to 
>>the file created in 1).
>>3) Create a dummy package.html with only a reference to the entity 
>>inside a body tag.
>>
>>This pulls the DocBook XML content into the XML file created by 
>>dbdoclet.
>>
>>--Jere
>>  
>
>

Other related posts: